Bond Arms GrizzlyvsKimber R7 Mako Tactical
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grizzly | 5 in | 3.5 in | 1.2 in | 20 oz |
| R7 Mako Tactical | 6.8 in | 5.3 in | 1 in | 26.2 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grizzly | 3 in | SAO | bondarms.com |
| R7 Mako Tactical | 3.37 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 45 Colt | .410 Bore | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grizzly | 1 | 1 | - |
| R7 Mako Tactical | - | - | 15 (+1) |
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Left Image
- Right Image
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Bond Arms Grizzly For Sale
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
