Diamondback DB9FSvsSmith & Wesson M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 7.8 in | 5.6 in | 1 in | 21.5 oz |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 8 in | 5.6 in | 1.2 in | 28.5 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 4.75 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 4.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 15 , 23 (+1) | 15 , 23 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
