Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsErmox X-Fire XF-9
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| X-Fire XF-9 | 7.29 in | 5.31 in | 1.29 in | 28.96 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| X-Fire XF-9 | 4.01 in | Striker-Fired | ermoxusa.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| X-Fire XF-9 | 15 , 17 , 19 (+1) | 15 , 17 , 19 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
