Handgun comparison iconHandgun comparison icon

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact vs Ermox X-Fire XF-9

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact facing right

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact

Striker-Fired Subcompact Pistol Chambered in 9mm Luger
vs
Ermox X-Fire XF-9 facing left

Ermox X-Fire XF-9

Striker-Fired Compact Pistol Chambered in 9mm Luger

Dimensions

 LengthLHeightHWidthWWeightW
DBAM29 Sub-compact6.49 in4.6 in1.09 in22 oz
X-Fire XF-97.29 in5.31 in1.29 in28.96 oz

Details

 BarrelBBL Trigger Website
DBAM29 Sub-compact3.5 in Striker-Fired diamondbackfirearms.com
X-Fire XF-94.01 in Striker-Fired ermoxusa.com

Capacity

 9mm Luger9mm Luger
DBAM29 Sub-compact 12 , 17 (+1) 12 , 17 (+1)
X-Fire XF-9 15 , 17 , 19 (+1) 15 , 17 , 19 (+1)

Notes

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact

5.6" height with extended magazine

Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts

How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?

76543210012345670123456701234567

pan left/right to see both handguns

Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison

Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother

Handguns
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
100
View
Ermox X-Fire XF-9
100
View
[ { "x": 0, "y": 0 }, { "x": 0, "y": 0 } ]
0123456786543210
Choose a Handgun
Diamondback
DBAM29 Sub-compact
Choose a Handgun
Ermox
X-Fire XF-9