Handgun comparison iconHandgun comparison icon

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsSmith & Wesson CSX E 3.1"

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact facing right

DiamondbackDBAM29 Sub-compact

Striker-Fired Subcompact Pistol Chambered in 9mm Luger
vs
Smith & Wesson CSX E 3.1" facing left

Smith & WessonCSX E 3.1"

SAO Subcompact Pistol Chambered in 9mm Luger

Dimensions

 LengthLHeightHWidthWWeightW
DBAM29 Sub-compact6.49 in4.6 in1.09 in22 oz
CSX E 3.1"6.1 in4.6 in1.12 in19.7 oz

Details

 BarrelBBLTriggerWebsite
DBAM29 Sub-compact3.5 inStriker-Fireddiamondbackfirearms.com
CSX E 3.1"3.1 inSAOsmith-wesson.com

Capacity

 9mm Luger9mm Luger
DBAM29 Sub-compact12 , 17 (+1)12 , 17 (+1)
CSX E 3.1"12 , 15 , 17 (+1)12 , 15 , 17 (+1)

Notes

Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact

5.6" height with extended magazine

Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts

How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?

6543210012345601234560123456

pan left/right to see both handguns

Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison

Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother

Handguns
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
100
View
Smith & Wesson CSX E 3.1"
100
View
[ { "x": 0, "y": 0 }, { "x": 0, "y": 0 } ]
01234567543210
Choose a Handgun
Diamondback
DBAM29 Sub-compact
Choose a Handgun
Smith & Wesson
CSX E 3.1"