Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsSmith & Wesson M&P 40 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| M&P 40 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 6.6 in | 4.98 in | 1.3 in | 25.9 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| M&P 40 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 40 S&W | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | - |
| M&P 40 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | - | 10 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
