Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact vs Wilson Combat CQB Compact
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| CQB Compact | 7.6 in | 5.1 in | 1.3 in | 37.2 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| CQB Compact | 4 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 45 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | - |
| CQB Compact | - | 7 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Wilson Combat CQB Compact
Also chambered in 9mm and 38 Super. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Wilson Combat CQB Compact For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
