Sarsilmaz SAR 9T vs Wilson Combat CQB Compact
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAR 9T | 7.6 in | 5.5 in | 1.25 in | 27.1 oz |
| CQB Compact | 7.6 in | 5.1 in | 1.3 in | 37.2 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAR 9T | 4.4 in | Striker-Fired | sarsilmaz.com |
| CQB Compact | 4 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 45 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| SAR 9T | 17 (+1) | - |
| CQB Compact | - | 7 (+1) |
Notes
Wilson Combat CQB Compact
Also chambered in 9mm and 38 Super. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Wilson Combat CQB Compact For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
