Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" CompactvsRemington 1911 R1 10mm Hunter
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 6.8 in | 5 in | 1.16 in | 24.5 oz |
| 1911 R1 10mm Hunter | 9.5 in | 5.75 in | 0 in | 41 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| 1911 R1 10mm Hunter | 6 in | SAO | remarms.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 10mm Auto | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 15 (+1) | - |
| 1911 R1 10mm Hunter | - | 8 (+1) |
Remington 1911 R1 10mm Hunter is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Width
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
-md-480.jpg)
