Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" CompactvsRuger EC9s
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 6.8 in | 5 in | 1.16 in | 24.5 oz |
| EC9s | 6 in | 4.95 in | 0.9 in | 17.2 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| EC9s | 3.12 in | Striker-Fired | ruger.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
| EC9s | 7 (+1) | 7 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Compact For Sale
Ruger EC9s For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
-md-480.jpg)
