Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" SubcompactvsKimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 6.6 in | 4.98 in | 1.3 in | 25 oz |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 7 in | 5.3 in | 1.16 in | 26.4 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 3.92 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 12 , 10 (+1) | 12 , 10 (+1) |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact For Sale
Kimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
