Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 4.0" Compact vs Sarsilmaz B6C-LR
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 4.0" Compact | 7.25 in | 5 in | 1.16 in | 28.7 oz |
| B6C-LR | 7.3 in | 5 in | 1.1 in | 20.5 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 4.0" Compact | 4 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| B6C-LR | 4.2 in | DA/SA | sarsilmaz.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 22 LR | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 4.0" Compact | 15 (+1) | - |
| B6C-LR | - | 10 (+1) |
Sarsilmaz B6C-LR is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Left Image
- Right Image
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 4.0" Compact For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
-md-480.jpg)
