Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 ShieldvsColt 1903 Pocket Hammerless
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Shield | 6.1 in | 4.6 in | 0.95 in | 18.3 oz |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | 6.5 in | 4.36 in | 1.2 in | 24 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Shield | 3.1 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | 3.75 in | SAO | usarmamentcorp.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 32 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Shield | 7 , 8 (+1) | - |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | - | 8 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
