Taurus Slim 709vsWilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slim 709 | 6 in | 4.5 in | 1 in | 19 oz |
| CQB Commander Compact | 7.85 in | 4.9 in | 1.3 in | 36.5 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slim 709 | 3 in | Striker-Fired | taurususa.com |
| CQB Commander Compact | 4.25 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 45 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Slim 709 | 7 (+1) | - |
| CQB Commander Compact | - | 7 (+1) |
Notes
Wilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
Also chambered in 9mm. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
