Diamondback DB9FSvsKimber Micro 9 ESV (MC)(TP)
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 7.8 in | 5.6 in | 1 in | 21.5 oz |
| Micro 9 ESV (MC)(TP) | 7.09 in | 4.85 in | 1.08 in | 19.2 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 4.75 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| Micro 9 ESV (MC)(TP) | 3.65 in | SAO | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DB9FS | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
| Micro 9 ESV (MC)(TP) | 7 (+1) | 7 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
