Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsColt 1903 Pocket Hammerless
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | 6.5 in | 4.36 in | 1.2 in | 24 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | 3.75 in | SAO | usarmamentcorp.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 32 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | - |
| 1903 Pocket Hammerless | - | 8 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
