Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsFranklin Armory CA320
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| CA320 | 0 in | 0 in | 0 in | 0 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| CA320 | 3.9 in | Striker-Fired | franklinarmory.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| CA320 | - |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Franklin Armory CA320 is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Length
- Width
- Height
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
