Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsKimber R7 Mako Tactical
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| R7 Mako Tactical | 6.8 in | 5.3 in | 1 in | 26.2 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| R7 Mako Tactical | 3.37 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| R7 Mako Tactical | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Left Image
- Right Image
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
