Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compactvsSmith & Wesson CSX E 3.6"
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| CSX E 3.6" | 6.6 in | 4.6 in | 1.12 in | 23.5 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| CSX E 3.6" | 3.6 in | SAO | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| CSX E 3.6" | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Smith & Wesson CSX E 3.6" For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
