Kimber R7 Mako TacticalvsSmith & Wesson CSX E 3.1"
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R7 Mako Tactical | 6.8 in | 5.3 in | 1 in | 26.2 oz |
| CSX E 3.1" | 6.1 in | 4.6 in | 1.12 in | 19.7 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R7 Mako Tactical | 3.37 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
| CSX E 3.1" | 3.1 in | SAO | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| R7 Mako Tactical | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
| CSX E 3.1" | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) |
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Left Image
- Right Image
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Kimber R7 Mako Tactical For Sale
Smith & Wesson CSX E 3.1" For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
