Ruger EC9svsSmith & Wesson M&P 2.0 45 4" Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 6 in | 4.95 in | 0.9 in | 17.2 oz |
| M&P 2.0 45 4" Compact | 7.2 in | 5.6 in | 1.3 in | 28.2 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 3.12 in | Striker-Fired | ruger.com |
| M&P 2.0 45 4" Compact | 4 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 45 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 7 (+1) | - |
| M&P 2.0 45 4" Compact | - | 10 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
