Sarsilmaz SAR 9 SCvsWilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAR 9 SC | 6.4 in | 4.8 in | 1.1 in | 17.6 oz |
| CQB Commander Compact | 7.85 in | 4.9 in | 1.3 in | 36.5 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAR 9 SC | 3.3 in | Striker-Fired | sarsilmaz.com |
| CQB Commander Compact | 4.25 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 45 ACP | |
|---|---|---|
| SAR 9 SC | 12 (+1) | - |
| CQB Commander Compact | - | 7 (+1) |
Notes
Wilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
Also chambered in 9mm. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
