Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 3.6"vsSmith & Wesson CSX E 3.1"
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 3.6" | 6.85 in | 5 in | 1.3 in | 26 oz |
| CSX E 3.1" | 6.1 in | 4.6 in | 1.12 in | 19.7 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 3.6" | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
| CSX E 3.1" | 3.1 in | SAO | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 3.6" | 15 (+1) | 15 (+1) |
| CSX E 3.1" | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 15 , 17 (+1) |
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 3.6" For Sale
Smith & Wesson CSX E 3.1" For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
