TriStar C-100 40S&WvsKimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-100 40S&W | 7.2 in | 5.35 in | 1.41 in | 35.2 oz |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 7 in | 5.3 in | 1.16 in | 26.4 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-100 40S&W | 3.93 in | DA/SA | tristararms.com |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 3.92 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 40 S&W | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| C-100 40S&W | 11 (+1) | - |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | - | 15 (+1) |
TriStar C-100 40S&W is missing data required to properly compare side-by-side
- Left Image
- Right Image
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Kimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
