Walther PPS M2 vs Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPS M2 | 6.3 in | 4.4 in | 1 in | 21.1 oz |
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPS M2 | 3.18 in | Striker-Fired | waltherarms.com |
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| PPS M2 | 6 , 7 , 8 (+1) | 6 , 7 , 8 (+1) |
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Walther PPS M2 For Sale
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
