Wilson Combat CQB Commander CompactvsKimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact
vs
Dimensions
| LengthL | HeightH | WidthW | WeightW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 7.85 in | 4.9 in | 1.3 in | 36.5 oz |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 7 in | 5.3 in | 1.16 in | 26.4 oz |
Details
| BarrelBBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 4.25 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | 3.92 in | Striker-Fired | kimberamerica.com |
Capacity
| 45 ACP | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 7 (+1) | - |
| R7 Mako Carbon Compact | - | 15 (+1) |
Notes
Wilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
Also chambered in 9mm. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-SideSide-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Kimber R7 Mako Carbon Compact For Sale
TabletopTabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
